Where whatever-recall is going — the release roadmap, and the long-horizon evolution to graph-native code structure. Today's folders and files are built for human reading; an AI navigates the dependency graph, not the tree. The horizon turns it around: the graph becomes the source of truth and the file layout becomes a view rendered from it, so an AI can structure and design code the way it thinks while recall renders it back to ordinary files for the compiler, the team and git.

The roadmap & the evolution

This is the roadmap, not today's product. Everything past v1.0 is where we are going — it is not shipped yet, and we'll always say so plainly. The numbers and order can shift as we harden on real user feedback.

The release roadmap

We alternate build releases with harden releases — ship a layer, then stabilise it on real feedback before the next one. The big leap (a native app and graph-native structure) comes only after the foundation has paid for itself.

ReleaseFocusWhat it brings
v1.0The foundation — shipping nowWrite-time memory, 0-token reads, the pre-edit gate, search-inversion, the predicate trust-flag. The real, proven product.
v1.1HardeningPriority bugs, polish, and the first wave of user feedback — no new surface, just solid.
v1.2The app & deeper featuresA real native app (not the local dashboard), with more — including write-side features, real project planning, and a proper team wiki.
v1.3HardeningStabilise the app on feedback from real teams.
v1.4The evolution — graph-nativeThe horizon below: the graph as the source of truth, files rendered from it. The deepest change, taken only when the ground under it is solid.

The rest of this page explains the last step — the evolution — because it's the one that changes how AI reasons about code.

This is a horizon, not a v1.0 checkbox. It's where we're headed once the app exists and the foundation has earned it.

The idea in one line

Today your code lives in folders and files — a structure invented for human reading. An AI doesn't navigate by folders; it navigates the graph of how the code actually connects. recall already holds that graph. The evolution is to make the graph the source of truth, and the file layout a view rendered from it.

A 3D preview of recall's graph-native code view: an AI navigates the dependency graph, not the folder tree — code blocks stacked into glowing layers, wired by their real relationships and coloured by six relationship dimensions, with data flowing along the connections.

*A glimpse of the graph-native horizon — a prototype, not shipped yet. The blocks are files and symbols, the lines are recall's real edges (depends_on, co_changed, implements, guarded_by, relates_to, decided_by), and the flowing light is data moving along them.*

Why this is the logical next step

It's the same move as search-inversion, one layer deeper:

  • Search-inversion said: the AI shouldn't have to guess the human name for a

thing — recall corrects it to the repo's real vocabulary.

  • Structure-as-render says: the AI shouldn't have to inhabit the human

structure either — file boundaries, one-symbol-per-file, folder trees are human reading crutches, not how an AI reasons about code.

recall is uniquely able to do this because it already collected the structural truth at write-time: depends_on, co_changed, decided_by, implements, importance. The folder tree is, today, only the human projection of that graph. We invert the projection.

How it would work (honestly staged)

We build this in steps, each useful on its own — no big-bang:

  1. **Now / cheap — recall suggests structure.** Instead of imposing anything,

recall points out where code semantically belongs: *"this symbol lives in file Y but co-changes 80% with cluster X."* A read over the graph recall already has.

  1. A graph-first view. The dashboard groups code by meaning (the dependency and

decision graph), not by folder. The folder tree becomes a filter, not the truth.

  1. Structure as a render (v1.2). The AI works the graph; recall renders it back

to ordinary files for your compiler, your team and git. The execution layer is still file-based — Python imports by path, bundlers by module, git diffs lines — so this only works by rendering back to files at build/commit time. That render/round-trip layer is the real engineering, and it's the feature.

What it does not change

  • Your repo stays a normal repo. It still compiles, still diffs in git, still

reads as files for any human who opens it. The graph-native view is added, the file view is rendered — never taken away.

  • recall still never edits your code without you. The same hands-off contract as

v1.0: nothing is restructured silently; you approve, as always.

The honest boundary

This is a horizon we're committing to, not a checkbox that's done. When parts of it ship, they'll land in the changelog with the same rule as everything else: only measured, only real, and clearly marked.